CIA Director John Brennan defended
harsh interrogation techniques, saying they provided information -- some of
which was "useful" in the raid that led to the death of Osama bin
Laden, but he said it was "unknowable" what information could
specifically be attributed to those techniques.
"It is our considered view that
the detainees who were subjected to enhanced interrogation techniques provided
information that was useful and was used in the ultimate operation to go
against Bin Laden," Brennan said.
Brennan's comments, in a rare news
conference, come two days after a Senate panel released a blockbuster 528-page
report detailing "enhanced interrogation techniques" -- including
mock executions, "rectal rehydration," sleep deprivation and beatings
-- in interrogations in the mid-2000s.
He admitted that some CIA officers'
actions were "not authorized, were abhorrent and rightly should be
repudiated by all. And we fell short in holding some officers accountable for
their mistakes."
Brennan acknowledged that the agency
sometimes exceeded its legal authority during interrogations of terrorism
suspects.
He said detainees who faced
"enhanced interrogation techniques" did provide some information that
provided useful -- as well as other information that didn't. He said whether
those interrogations had anything to do with that information is
"unknowable."
"Let me be clear: We have not
concluded that it was the EITs within that program that allowed us to obtain
useful information from the detainees subjected to them," he said.
But he staunchly defended the agency
during the 45-minute news conference, adding: "CIA officers' actions that
did comport with the law and policy should neither be criticized nor conflated
with the actions of the few who did not follow the guidance issued."
Brennan opened his remarks with a
vivid depiction of the events of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, and
described the atmosphere going into fighting terrorism and collecting
intelligence in the immediate aftermath of the attacks.
"There were no easy answers,
and whatever your views are on [enhanced interrogation techniques], our nation
and in particular this agency did a lot of things right during this difficult
time to keep this country strong and secured," Brennan said.
Brennan praised those who worked
with him but he added the agency was "unprepared to conduct a detention
and interrogation program, and our officers inadequately developed and
monitored its initial activities."
Brennan never used the word
"torture" to describe the CIA's tactics. And he deflected a question
about whether, in the interest of transparency, he supported the Senate
Intelligence Committee's decision to release its report.
"I think there's been more than
enough transparency that's happened over the last couple days," he said.
"I think it's over the top."
Brennan said it's
"lamentable" that the Senate panel didn't conduct interviews with CIA
agents -- a contrast, he said, with its handling of a report on Iraq's lack of
weapons of mass destruction, which included interviews with more than 200
officers.
His strongest criticism of the
report was with its contention that the CIA misled the public and government
officials -- including then-President George W. Bush. That, Brennan said, is
untrue -- a stance former Vice President Dick Cheney backed up in an interview
with Fox News on Wednesday night.
Still, he didn't fault the report's
finding that the CIA's tactics were harsh and, at times, went beyond the legal
authority Bush's Justice Department said the agency had.
"Many aspects of their
conclusions are sound and consistent with our own prior findings," Brennan
said. "Over the years, internal agency reviews, including numerous
investigations by our office of the inspector general, found fault in the CIA's
running of the program. We have acknowledged these mistakes."
Brennan was the CIA's deputy
executive director while the tactics were being used. He said he had "some
visibility" into what was happening, but that he wasn't in the chain of
command for that program, and didn't say whether he had made any effort to push
for changes at the time.
He also noted that the program for
using "enhanced interrogation techniques" was ended in 2007.
"In light of the fact that
these techniques were banned seven years ago, however, my fervent hope is that
we can put aside this debate and move on to issues that are relevant to our
current national security challenges," Brennan said.
Meanwhile, one of Brennan's sharpest
critics, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the chairwoman of the committee behind the
report, live-tweeted along with the press conference and sharply rebutted
several points throughout his press conference.