More than 200 U.S. companies came together Tuesday to support a major
reduction in carbon pollution from power plants proposed by the
Environmental Protection Agency.
"As businesses concerned about
the immediate and long-term implications of climate change, we strongly
support the principles behind the draft carbon pollution standard for
existing power plants," states a letter that was sent to the EPA, the
Obama administration and congressional leaders.
Major brand names
and Fortune 500 companies — including Kellogg's, Starbucks, Ikea, Levi
Strauss and Nestlé — were among the 223 companies that signed the
letter.
The proposed EPA rule aims to reduce carbon pollution from
the nation's power plants by 30% from 2005 levels. It represents one of
the most significant actions ever taken by the U.S. government to fight
climate change. The public comment period for the plan ended Monday,
and the EPA should announce a final rule next summer.
Carbon
dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels is the greenhouse gas that's
most responsible for global warming, according to the near-unanimous
conclusion of climate scientists.
"Our support is firmly grounded
in economic reality," the letter states. "We know that tackling climate
change is one of America's greatest economic opportunities of the 21st
century and we applaud the EPA for taking steps to help the country
seize that opportunity."
"These companies recognize that the EPA's power plant rule is a
critical step in mitigating climate risks and accelerating low-carbon
technologies that hold enormous economic promise," said Mindy Lubber,
president of the non-profit sustainability group Ceres, which helped
organize the letter.
She added that there are some unfounded
assumptions that environmental regulations are bad for the economy and
bad for jobs, but the facts don't bear that out.
"Achieving the
proposed carbon reductions from existing power plants through energy
efficiency retrofits of existing buildings will reduce greenhouse gas
emissions and our impact on the planet, reduce costs for both power
companies and consumers, and help drive the economy by creating jobs,"
said Dan Probst, Chairman of Energy and Sustainability Services at JLL, a
global real estate management and investment firm headquartered in
Chicago.
As an example, Probst said that retrofitting old buildings in Illinois alone should create more than 7,000 jobs.
"We
as a company believe we all need to play our part in moving toward a
more low-carbon society and economy," said John Gardner, VP and Chief
Sustainability Officer at Novelis, the world's largest manufacturer of
rolled aluminum.
"It's a win economically and win environmentally," he said.
"As
the world's largest food and beverage company, Nestlé places a great
deal of importance on environmental responsibility," said Tim Brown,
President and CEO of Nestlé Waters North America. "Nestlé is 148 years
old and we want to be here for another 148 years," he said, and that's
"dependent on a stable environment to operate in."
Other business
groups don't see such a rosy picture: This week, the Competitive
Enterprise Institute and 11 other free-market organizations submitted
their own public comments to the EPA, saying the Clean Power Plan would
increase electricity prices and raise reliability concerns across the
country.
According to CEI senior fellow Marlo Lewis, the Clean
Power Plan is illegitimate and unlawful: "The plan's putative climate
benefits are illusory — the regulation should be withdrawn."
COMMENTS